Steel City Stonewall Democrats

Homophobic Anti-Marriage/Anti-Domestic Partnership Constitutional Amendment tabled in the PA Senate due to opposition in PA House of Representatives.

Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:59:20 -0500

After passing two key Committees in the Republican controled State Senate, proponents of the Homophobic PA Marriage Amendment voted for the time being to table the Amendment.

The vote to table the Amendment, came after key Democrats in the State House of Representatives publicly declared they would do everything in the power to kill the Amendment.

Democrats currently control the PA House of Representatives by just one vote.

Click the screen below to see a compiliation of still photos from the anti-SB1250 Rally in the Capitol Building in Harrisburg

Below is a picture from our Beth Hafer Meet & Greet. Beth is the 3rd person on the left.

Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:08:03 -0500

Special Thanks to Scott Noxon & There Video Lounge for providing the space and refreshments.

Thanks to everyone who helped out during the Pennsylvania Primary

Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:45:16 -0500

There were many good candidates that sought our endorsement. In each race a majority vote (50% + 1) of the Steel-City Stonewall Democrats membership voting was required for endorsement.

Congratulatons to all of our endorsed candidates below who won in the Pennsylvania Primary.

United States President
Hillary Clinton www.hillaryclinton.com

Pennsylvania State Treasurer
Rob McCord www.mccordforpennsylvania.com

United States Congress, District 14
Mike Doyle www.mikedoyleforcongress.com

PA House of Representatives 19th District
Jake Wheatley - www.pahouse.com/wheatley

PA House of Representatives 23rd District
Dan B. Frankel www.pahouse.com/frankel

PA House of Representatives 24th District
Joe Preston www.pahouse.com/preston

Also, congratulations to the victorious candidates below who received SCSD honorable mentions.

Jason Altmire for United States Congress, District 4.

Colleen A. Cooke for Delegate to the Democratic National Convention for Congressional District 4

Dan Frankel, Joe Preston, Doug Shields,for Delegate to the Democratic National Convention for Congressional District 14

Information and candidate questionnaires for the people who sought our endorsement our posted below in our blog.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In our past Board Elections Toeknee Bailey, Joanne Bostjanick, Michael Braxton, Nachum Golan, Mike Haye, Emilia Lombardi, Jay Molluso, Kris Rust, & Janis Williams all won seats on the Steel-City Stonewall Democrats Board. Short bios for our 2008 Board members are available in the "About Us" link at the top of the left column on this page.

Candidate Surveys

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:22:07 -0500

CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRES FOR THE APRIL 22ND, 2008 PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name of Candidate: Jennifer L. Mann
Office Sought: State Treasurer
Email address: paulgage@comcast.net

Please list any receptions, events, parades or other functions that you have attended that were sponsored by an LGBT group or organization:

As a State Representative serving in my tenth year, I have consistently attended and supported and spoken at the Lehigh Valley Chapter of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Pride Festival and parade. I am proud of my support for our regional LGBT organization and look forward to working with people across PA regardless of their sexual orientations and gender identity. My district in the City of Allentown has a very active LGBT community and I encourage you to contact them.

Describe your familiarity with Greater Pittsburgh's LGBT Community.

While not familiar with your organization or LGBT issues specific to the Great Pittsburgh region, I have no doubt that you face many of the same challenges that the Lehigh Valley LGBT community confronts including bigotry, intolerance and outright discrimination in jobs, housing, etc.

Just recently, I spoke with a gay man in my legislative district whose house was vandalized with tar by a neighbor and his teenage son. Prior to the incident, the victim was repeatedly referred to in the strongest homophobic hate language that this man and son could spew. After the vandalism occurred (which totaled more than $10,000), the Allentown Police Department made the arrest and a trial is pending. The bottom line is that this sort of indefensible behavior is all too familiar in Pennsylvania and the State must do all it can to stamp it out.

What is your position on hiring LGBT people? Should LGBT people be hired in the public sector?

I believe very strongly in the in strength of a diverse workforce. Not only should members of the LGBT community NEVER be discriminated against in the workforce, hiring gays, lesbians, bisexual and transgendered people can help better serve all Pennsylvanians.

Would you hire an openly LGBT person on your staff?

Yes

The Federal Government, the State nor the County Government have laws that offer protection from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing or public accommodations. Would you support legislation against such discrimination?

Yes

Please explain:

Throughout my entire legislative career, I have supported a number of anti-discrimination including House Bill 1400 (2007-2008) which would outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. I have also supported Senate Bill 912 (2005-2006) and efforts by Rep. Dan Frankel of Pittsburgh to amend the Human Relations Act to further prohibit discrimination.

Please discuss your views on amending the law to include such protections on real or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

Again, throughout my legislative career, I have been 100% supportive of laws that would protect people in the workforce from discrimination based on the perception of sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

LGBT citizens are also discriminated against by the government. "Don't Ask Don't Tell" not only stops LGBT citizens from serving openly in the military, it also encourages anti-gay harassment in stopping victims from reporting harassment by labeling it as "telling" under the policy. Would you vote to end “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy”?

Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell is fundamentally a federal issue, and therefore the office of the State Treasurer has no say on this policy. However, I assure you that there will be no such endorsement of discrimination or encouragement of anti-gay harassment in the office of State Treasurer if I am elected.

In addition, Hospitals often refuse to discuss end-of-life issues with same-sex partners and GLBT senior citizens are often discriminated against by health providers who fail to recognize their relationships. Would you support government regulations that would stop this discrimination?

Yes and without reservation.

Victims of same-sex domestic violence face a fear that police and emergency responders will not respond appropriately when the couple is the same sex and LGBT people face discrimination by emergency services personnel. For example, preoperative transgender people may be afraid to call emergency services for fear of being ridiculed. If elected, what would you do to help eliminate this problem?

I would be more than happy to offer whatever leadership I could provide as State Treasurer to address this issue.

Do you support domestic partner benefits for government and governmental agency employees?

Yes

Discuss your thoughts on marriage equality for same-sex couples; while the position you seek may not directly affect this issue, it is important for us to understand your perspective.

I support same-sex partnerships in the form of Civil Unions and have constituently voted AGAINST constitutional amendments banning gay marriage including those sponsored by Reps. Boyd and Metcalf.
Over the past decade, government money has been used to promote “abstinence-only-until-marriage” programs in schools. Even though same-sex couples still cannot legally marry in Pennsylvania, to qualify for government support, schools must teach that any sexual relationships outside of marriage is “likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects.”

Do you support or oppose abstinence-only-until-marriage curricula?

Oppose

Discuss your thoughts on government's role in shaping school curricula for sex education, including comprehensive education that advocates for safe sex and the use of condoms and birthcontrol.

I strongly support teaching comprehensive sex education in our public schools that acknowledges the pros and cons of every type of birth control.

Do you have any thoughts on the formation of gay-straight student alliances within the public school systems?

This is an idea that I am not familiar with, as I don’t know of any in my region of the state. I am certainly quite interested in this concept and welcome a further conversation about it.

Please discuss your views on protection from real, or perceived, discrimination in the schools and in school extra-curricula activities regarding sexual orientation, gender identity and gender identification, including bullying.

My opposition to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity and gender identification is not limited to adults. Therefore I strongly support protections against this awful practice in our schools.

Do you support needle exchange as a way of reducing new HIV infections in IV drug users?

Support

Throughout my tenure as a State Representative, I have offered my support for a policy of needle exchange. However I have some concerns about this policy and believe that we must examine conditions for such a plan.

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

The State Treasurer is essentially the Commonwealth’s chief banker and investment officer. I fundamentally believe that the best investment strategies are not only ones that have the greatest impact on the State’s bottom line, but also deliver the greatest impact on our community. As such, if I choose to invest in a certain health insurance company, I will take into consideration their community health care efforts. This would certainly be part of the conversation.

Do you support inclusion of LGBT people within the official Democratic Party structure, including official representation on the county, state and national levels, including increasing the number of GLBT delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Denver?

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

As a statewide elected office holder, I will advocate to TJ Rooney and other party leaders for the inclusion of LGBT Pennsylvanians to be included in all party activities on every level (from local to national). Furthermore, I will help recruit and cultivate people from the LGBT community to join our party and seek leadership opportunities.

Have you ever supported an openly LGBT person running for public office? Do you believe a person's sexuality or gender identity should stop them from running for public office?

In 2003, the City of Allentown (where I both live and represent in the PA General Assembly) elected our first openly gay member of City Council. I am proud to call Gail Hoover not only a pioneer in Allentown, but a great friend.

In his book, The Rise of the Creative Class, University of Pittsburgh Professor Richard Florida argues that communities that are open to diversity and to LGBT people prospered better than those that were not as open. What would you do to make the region and the state more welcoming to its LGBT citizens?

We cannot begin to call Pennsylvania open and inclusive without the Government taking the lead. That is why I support the policies listed above and will continue to do all that I can to advocate for the State Government to become more tolerant and inclusive.

If elected, what outreach would you do to the LGBT business community to encourage their participation in community planning and economic development?

As a former successful small business woman and one of the very few female state elected officials in Pennsylvania, I have a unique perspective. I understand the challenges faced by people who are routinely underrepresented in the State. As such, I will make it a priority to seek qualified LGBT small businesses to work with across the State.

Currently, both locally and statewide, GLBT citizens are underrepresented on Boards and Commissions. Would you advocate on behalf of qualified GLBT citizens who are interested in appointments?

As I have consistently stated, I will continue to recruit and cultivate GLBT citizens for positions of leadership. State Boards and Commissions are no different, and I will do all that I can to fill my board appointments with people that represent a diverse cross-section of Pennsylvania’s residents.

Another divisive issue confronting our country is the issue of abortion. Please discuss your position on abortion and any thoughts you have on the current abortion debate.

I am proud of my complete and unwavering support for a woman’s right to choose. I will always support the basic tenants of Roe v. Wade, will never support a restriction of abortion services and will continue to support funding for organizations that provide full reproductive health services. I am proud to have had the support of Planned Parenthood, EMILY’s List, NARAL and other pro-choice organizations throughout my legislative career.

What other endorsements have you received? Are you supported by any unions?

For this election cycle, I have to date been endorsed by a number of elected officials across the State including several from the Pittsburgh region. I have received the endorsement of the Pennsylvania Professional Fire Fighters Association and am actively seeking the endorsement of organized labor, environmental groups, Democratic Party organizations, certain business organizations, civil rights groups and other organizations.

If you are endorsed by Steel City Stonewall Democrats, will you display it on your campaign literature, when possible and appropriate?

Yes, I would be proud of the endorsement, would post it on my website along with a link to your website (if you approve), would work with your organization on a press release and/or event, and would include it on all appropriate literature.

As a candidate, some of the issues raised in this questionnaire may be new to you. If elected, would you be willing to work with Steel City Stonewall Democrats and other representatives of the LGBT community to create a better understanding of the needs and issues confronting us?

Yes

Are there particular areas of concern that you have that we have not addressed?

No.

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Throughout my legislative career, I have been consistent on my support for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered Pennsylvanians. Fighting the bigotry and hatred that is all-too-prevalent in PA is not an easy task, but I truly applaud your efforts. Win or lose, you have an ally in me.

Signature of candidate and date signed

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Candidate: Rob McCord
Office Sought:: State Treasurer
Email address: jlisko@mccord2008.com

Please list any receptions, events, parades or other functions that you have attended that were sponsored by an LGBT group or organization:

Congressman Barney Frank (an old friend!) Meet & Greet at Judge Christine Donohue’s home in November 2007. Attended numerous New York City Gay Pride Parades.

Describe your familiarity with Greater Pittsburgh's LGBT Community.

I have long been a supporter of civil rights for the LGBT community and in the past year, I have become more familiar with Pittsburgh’s LGBT community through Tara Reynolds and Judge Christine Donohue.

What is your position on hiring LGBT people?

Should LGBT people be hired in the public sector? I absolutely believe that LGBT people should be hired in the public sector and I look forward to having a talented workforce, which is inclusive of many groups. I do oppose all forms of discrimination.

Would you hire an openly LGBT person on your staff?

Yes

Please discuss your views on amending the law to include such protections on real or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

I support State Representative Dan Frankel’s legislation to amend the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act to protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Pennsylvanians against discrimination.

Yes.

I believe there is a need for increased education and sensitivity training for emergency services personnel. I recognize the importance of this issue and I would look to the LGBT community for guidance and recommendations in forming a set of best practices.

Do you support domestic partner benefits for government and governmental agency employees?

Yes

Discuss your thoughts on marriage equality for same-sex couples; while the position you seek may not directly affect this issue, it is important for us to understand your perspective.

I believe this is a civil rights issue and should be treated as such. As a partner in an interracial marriage, I’m acutely conscious that my own marriage would have been illegal in many states when I was born.

Over the past decade, government money has been used to promote “abstinence-only-until-marriage” programs in schools. Even though same-sex couples still cannot legally marry in Pennsylvania, to qualify for government support, schools must teach that any sexual relationships outside of marriage is “likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects.” Do you support or oppose abstinence-only-until-marriage curricula?

Oppose

Discuss your thoughts on government's role in shaping school curricula for sex education, including comprehensive education that advocates for safe sex and the use of condoms and birthcontrol.

I support sex education that reflects the reality of adolescents today. In my opinion, this should include discussions about both abstinence and about contraception and safe sex measures.

Do you have any thoughts on the formation of gay-straight student alliances within the public school systems?

I believe that education on this topic is crucial and just recently, I have learned about the great work being carried out by the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN). While I have not yet had any personal experience with this group, I look forward to becoming further educated on the ways I could help to raise awareness on this issue.

I believe that LGBT sensitivity should be included in anti-bullying talks. Bullying should be discouraged on all fronts, but especially when it is motivated by bigotry.

Do you support needle exchange as a way of reducing new HIV infections in IV drug users?

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

I am unsure how the treasurer can affect this issue, but I support needle exchange as one of the many ways of reducing HIV infection.

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

As Treasurer, I expect to be active in the Democratic Party and hope to find ways to ensure increased diversity in Democratic leadership, including the delegate selection process.

Have you ever supported an openly LGBT person running for public office? Do you believe a person's sexuality or gender identity should stop them from running for public office?

Congressman Barney Frank is an old friend, and I am proud to have supported him for almost thirty years (he was also a friend of my father’s…from their civil rights work together in the 1960s). More recently, I have been a big fan of Judge Dan Anders (Philadelphia) and Pittsburgh City Councilman Bruce Kraus.

First, I would remind people of Florida’s work and strive to disseminate it. I would also support educational programs that openly refer to the existence of the LGBT community. Having lived in five major urban areas in my lifetime, I have seen for myself that Florida is correct about the many benefits of LGBT communities.

If elected, what outreach would you do to the LGBT business community to encourage their participation in community planning and economic development?

I would work especially closely with Pittsburgh City Councilman Bruce Kraus and other LGBT community leaders to make sure that the LGBT community has a “seat at the table.”

Currently, both locally and statewide, GLBT citizens are underrepresented on Boards and Commissions. Would you advocate on behalf of qualified GLBT citizens who are interested in appointments?

Yes.

Another divisive issue confronting our country is the issue of abortion. Please discuss your position on abortion and any thoughts you have on the current abortion debate.

I am ardently pro-choice, and I believe one of the most important reasons we have to elect a Democratic president is to help appoint judges who will protect our reproductive rights.

What other endorsements have you received? Are you supported by any unions?

Greater PA Regional Council of Carpenters, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local # 5, Amalgamated Transit Union Local #85, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers #154, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council #57, Utility Workers Local #102, United Steel Workers District 10, Pennsylvania Lt. Governor Catherine Baker Knoll , Former State Treasurer Barbara Hafer, Congressman Jason Altmire, Congresswoman Allyson Schwartz, Congressman Barney Frank, PA House of Representatives Former Speaker Bob O'Donnell, PA House Majority Leader Bill DeWeese, State Rep. Dan Frankel D-23, State Rep. Tim Solobay D-48, State Rep. Pat Harkins D-1, State Rep. Flo Fabrizio D-2, State Rep. Frank Dermody D-33, State Rep. Dan Surra D-75, State Rep. Mark Longietti D-7, State Rep. Vince Biancucci D-15, State Rep. Sean Ramaley D-16, State Rep. Matt Smith D-42, State Rep Tim Mahoney D-41, State Rep Daylin Leach D-149, State Rep Mike Gerber D-148, State Rep Tony Payton D-179PA, State Senator Connie Williams D-17, State Senator Wayne Fontana D-42

If you are endorsed by Steel City Stonewall Democrats, will you display it on your campaign literature, when possible and appropriate?

Yes

Are there particular areas of concern that you have that we have not addressed?

No. Just hope to learn more.

Is there anything else you would like to add?

I look forward to attending your endorsement meeting and having an open-ended conversation. Pensions and healthcare are especially acute issues for members of the LGBT community, and I’d like to work with leaders in the LGBT community to help increase consciousness of those issues and do good work in those areas.

Signature of candidate and date signed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Candidate: Dennis Morrison-Wesley
OfficeSought: State Treasurer
Email address: contact@wesleyforpa.com

Please list any receptions, events, parades or other functions that you have attended that were sponsored by an LGBT group or organization:

NONE

Describe your familiarity with Greater Pittsburgh's LGBT Community.

Not at all familiar

What is your position on hiring LGBT people? Should LGBT people be hired in the public sector?

The Treasurer’s Office should reflect the make up of the state

Would you hire an openly LGBT person on your staff?

Yes

Please discuss your views on amending the law to include such protections on real or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

My position is a citzen is a citizen and may have all the protections as any other citizen. I would support amending the law.

Yes, it’s foolish.

Yes I would support such regulations.

This is a issue where the I feel a individual must stand up and fight for their own rights. Such ridicule is wrong but one must stand up!

Do you support domestic partner benefits for government and governmental agency employees?

Yes

Discuss your thoughts on marriage equality for same-sex couples; while the position you seek may not directly affect this issue, it is important for us to understand your perspective.

I am for all the rights but not marriage.

No comment / no answer

Discuss your thoughts on government's role in shaping school curricula for sex education, including comprehensive education that advocates for safe sex and the use of condoms and birth control.

I am for it but only with the parents consent.

Do you have any thoughts on the formation of gay-straight student alliances within the public school systems?

If the students themselves form them it would be a good thing. But must not be forced by outsiders.

All student must be protected from bullying.

Do you support needle exchange as a way of reducing new HIV infections in IV drug users?

It depends how its done.

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

To be frank I don’t know.

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

I would fight hard for full status for LGBT’S.

Have you ever supported an openly LGBT person running for public office? Do you believe a person's sexuality or gender identity should stop them from running for public office?

.Yes! No one should be bared from running for office.

I would sit down with LGBT leaders to find way to make that happen.

If elected, what outreach would you do to the LGBT business community to encourage their participation in community planning and economic development?

My main goal after seeking a good return on state investments, is to grow job in Pa.. And the LGBT community must be part of that.

Currently, both locally and statewide, GLBT citizens are underrepresented on Boards and Commissions. Would you advocate on behalf of qualified GLBT citizens who are interested in appointments?

I will make sure GLBT’s are appointed.

Another divisive issue confronting our country is the issue of abortion. Please discuss your position on abortion and any thoughts you have on the current abortion debate.

I am Pro-Life that is my moral position but I am not a one issue candidate.

What other endorsements have you received? Are you supported by any unions?

I am speaking in front major unions in March.

If you are endorsed by Steel City Stonewall Democrats, will you display it on your campaign literature, when possible and appropriate?

Yes

Are there particular areas of concern that you have that we have not addressed?

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Signature of candidate and date signed

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRES CONTINUED IN THE NEXT BLOG ENTRY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Candidate Questionnaires Continued From Above

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:08:46 -0500

Name of Candidate: Mike Doyle
Office Sought: U.S. Congress --- PA 14th District
Email address:

Please list any receptions, events, parades or other functions that you have attended that were sponsored by an LGBT group or organization:

Most recently, I and the Steel-City Stonewall Dems hosted a meet and greet with Congressman Barney Frank when he visited Pittsburgh in November 2007. It was a great event that gave many people a chance to hear from Congressman Frank and exchange in a substantive give and take of ideas.

Another major event that I attended and participated in was the Gay & Lesbian Community Center of Pittsburgh’s charity fashion show – “Go Gorgeous” which took place in October 2003 at the Omni William Penn. I would certainly be open to participating in other events if invited and my schedule made attendance possible.
Describe your familiarity with Greater Pittsburgh's LGBT Community.

I have always had open communication with the community in the Pittsburgh area. Through informal conversation, official functions, meetings in my office, correspondence, and other means I believe I have a good familiarity and relationship with Pittsburgh’s LGBT community.

What is your position on hiring LGBT people? Should LGBT people be hired in the public sector?

I have been an original co-sponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) which would forbid employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and would further prohibit related retaliation and coercion. I was very pleased when it passed the House last fall. It is vitally important that ENDA be enacted as it would provide basic protections against workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and currently these protections do not exist.

In my own office, we have an established policy of non-discrimination, and I just recently once again signed a pledge put forth by the Human Rights Campaign in which I committed to upholding a non-discrimination policy relating to sexual orientation and gender identity as my official office policy. I have signed a similar pledge many times in the past. I do not believe LGBT people should be restricted from any employment opportunities and also certainly should be eligible to serve in the public sector.

Would you hire an openly LGBT person on your staff?

Yes, I not only would, but have hired an openly LGBT person on my staff.

Yes

Please explain:

Certainly I would support legislation against such discrimination.

Please discuss your views on amending the law to include such protections on real or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

I strongly believe these protections should be enacted immediately to cover not only employment, but housing and public accommodations. As I mentioned previously, I have been a co-sponsor of ENDA which would address the employment issues. I think it would be best to see these laws amended on a federal level so LGBT people throughout the country can be ensured an equal level of protection and we don’t see a patchwork quilt develop where some states have laws and others don’t. Ideally, these protections should be guaranteed at the federal level.

Yes. It’s time to let gays and lesbians openly join the military, which is why I am a co-sponsor of Rep. Marty Meehan’s “Military Readiness Enhancement Act.”

Yes

I certainly am aware of this problem and share your concern. This is a problem that exists throughout the country and quite simply should not be occurring. I would support any efforts our local officials would take to address this in the Pittsburgh area. Unfortunately, as a member of the US Congress I’m not clear what action I could take on the federal level to address this seemingly local issue. I would be open to further dialogue on that question and would try to be helpful with any federal actions that might make sense.

Do you support domestic partner benefits for government and governmental agency employees?

Yes, I support domestic partner benefits for public sector employees

Discuss your thoughts on marriage equality for same-sex couples; while the position you seek may not directly affect this issue, it is important for us to understand your perspective.

I strongly oppose President Bush’s call for enacting a constitutional amendment to ban civil marriage for same-sex couples and have stated my opposition publicly. I strongly believe that states and local governments should have the right to recognize civil unions if they choose to do so and I do not think the federal government should step in to overturn decisions made at the local level. Additionally, as I previously mentioned, I strongly believe that same-sex couples in civil unions should have all the rights and benefits traditionally granted to heterosexual couples. .I think that civil marriage for same-sex couples should be allowed and it would be a travesty for us to enact a constitutional amendment to ban it.

I oppose abstinence –only-until-marriage curricula.

Discuss your thoughts on government's role in shaping school curricula for sex education, including comprehensive education that advocates for safe sex and the use of condoms and birthcontrol.

At various times throughout my congressional career, amendments or bills have been voted on that seek to promote or provide additional funding to abstinence-only programs in the public schools. I have consistently opposed and voted against these efforts. Generally speaking, I believe that any government role in shaping school curricula for sex education or other issues should be handled at the state or local level and the federal government should not be in the business of determining curricula. I do however strongly support family planning and safe sex and believe that type of education should be forwarded in sex education classes.

Do you have any thoughts on the formation of gay-straight student alliances within the public school systems?

Any programs or alliances that may exist or be created designed to promote greater awareness, understanding, and communication between people of different sexual orientations would be a positive step and would be something I would support.

Again I believe that largely this issue has to be handled at the local level, but I certainly oppose any discrimination of this type. I have co-sponsored and voted for anti hate crimes legislation in Congress that address some of these types of issues on a wider scale beyond just educational environments.

Do you support needle exchange as a way of reducing new HIV infections in IV drug users?

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

I am a strong supporter of all types of AIDS prevention programs. Throughout my years in Congress, I have continually supported increased funding for AIDS research, prevention and treatment programs within the Department of Health and Human Services, including the National Institute of Health and the Center for Disease Control.

Additionally, with the overall rate of infection among adults in sub-Saharan Africa at about 8.4% compared to a 1.2% infection rate worldwide, I have supported legislative actions that would fund programs aimed at reducing the infection rate and helping to eliminate the AIDS epidemic in Africa through education and awareness programs.
I certainly recognize the vital importance of government support for AIDS prevention programs, and fully expect to continue my record of support for these programs.

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

I know of a number of openly LGBT people that work for the official Democratic party structure as employees of the DNC, DSCC, and DCCC in Washington. I know there has been some concern surrounding some of the restructuring efforts that current DNC chairman Howard Dean has instituted but I’ve been assured that the concerns of the LGBT community are still being heard and taken most seriously. LGBT people are an important part of the Democratic party and I would be open to other ways to continue their involvement in the party structure at all levels.

Have you ever supported an openly LGBT person running for public office? Do you believe a person's sexuality or gender identity should stop them from running for public office?

I have certainly supported openly LGBT people for elective office and would do so again. There are several members of Congress that are openly LGBT which I have supported such as Tammy Baldwin from Wisconsin who I assisted when she first ran for Congress in 1998. I do not believe in any sort of litmus test with regard to a candidate’s sexual orientation. If I support someone’s positions on many issues and their party affiliation, I am going to support them regardless of their sexual orientation. Likewise, if an LGBT person held positions on many issues or a party affiliation I didn’t agree with, I would not support them. I do not believe sexuality or gender identity should effect anyone’s decision as to whether to run for public office or not.

I am not surprised that Mr. Florida would make that argument as it seems almost self-evident. I strongly believe it is important to respect and listen to the views of all minority communities and I have done just that during my time in Congress. I think my record of efforts to support non-discrimination policies, co-sponsor ENDA, outlaw hate crimes, be personally involved in the LGBT community, and publicly promote greater understanding between all sexual orientations and genders are a partial example of the types of efforts that I have made to demonstrate the openness of the region to our LGBT citizens. I would hope that all the elected officials in the region would promote this type of attitude and set of beliefs publicly to help demonstrate the openness of our region to LGBT people.

If elected, what outreach would you do to the LGBT business community to encourage their participation in community planning and economic development?

Job creation and economic development have always been at the top of my agenda since I was first elected to Congress. I have founded the Doyle Center for Manufacturing. Worked with numerous businesses on specific issues, and supported more funding for job retraining programs among many other initiatives. I even have a district-based staffer who as my Economic Development Coordinator, is specifically tasked to work on these issues with local businesses. My Economic Development Coordinator would be happy to meet with anyone LGBT business community to assist them in any manner that is possible just as we would do with any other group or business that requests assistance. A thriving business community is integral to the health of our region and this needs to include members of the LGBT community as well as everyone else.

Currently, both locally and statewide, GLBT citizens are underrepresented on Boards and Commissions. Would you advocate on behalf of qualified GLBT citizens who are interested in appointments?

Yes.

Another divisive issue confronting our country is the issue of abortion. Please discuss your position on abortion and any thoughts you have on the current abortion debate.

I am a strong supporter of embryonic stem cell research, have supported increased funding for family planning both domestically and internationally, support the emergency contraception legislation, and opposed efforts by the government to intervene in the Terry Schiavo case. On all of these important issues, I have differed with the official “pro-life” position. While I do oppose federal funding of abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or when the mother’s life is in danger, I have not been an outspoken activist on this issue by any means.

What other endorsements have you received? Are you supported by any unions?

I have been endorsed by a wide variety and very numerous group of people and organizations over the years in addition to this years campaign. One significant endorsement is that of the Allegheny County Democratic Committee. As far as I know, I am endorsed and supported by every union and have been very proud to have the strong support, both financially and logistically, of labor for many years.

If you are endorsed by Steel City Stonewall Democrats, will you display it on your campaign literature, when possible and appropriate?

Yes

Are there particular areas of concern that you have that we have not addressed?

No.

Is there anything else you would like to add?

I would be honored to receive the endorsement of the Steel City Stonewall Democrats. I certainly feel my record in Congress and position of the issues important to the LGBT community merit endorsement. I have enjoyed getting to know many members of your organization better in the recent past, and appreciate the work that you do and the willingness of your members to become involved in the political process.

You may also be interested to know that I have received substantial support over the years in the form of numerous financial contributions to my campaign from the Human Rights Campaign PAC and am pleased to have received an 100% support rating on their most recent congressional scorecard.

I appreciate your consideration of my re-election candidacy.

Signature of candidate and date signed
/s/ Mike Doyle
22 February 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Candidate: Beth Hafer
Office Sought: U.S. Congress (PA-18)
Email address: beth@haferforcongress.com

Please list any receptions, events, parades or other functions that you have attended that were sponsored by an LGBT group or organization:

I attended “Pride Fest” Parade in the fall and walked with the Stonewall Democrats. I attended the Kennedy-Lawrence dinner featuring Barney Frank and had the privilege of dining with his partner. Most recently, I attended the Super Tuesday event on Feb 5, which was co-hosted by Stonewall. Prominent members of LGBT community have hosted events for me. I welcome invitations and will make a concerted effort to attend.

Describe your familiarity with Greater Pittsburgh's LGBT Community.

I encourage open communication with all people. Through informal communication, official events, meetings and newsletters I try to stay informed about issues and concerns of LGBT community.

What is your position on hiring LGBT people? Should LGBT people be hired in the public sector?

I hire the best person for the job and I oppose any employment discrimination. I fully support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) which would forbid employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and would further prohibit related retaliation and coercion. Currently, these protections do not exist. LGBT people should be eligible to serve as government workers and should not be restricted from any employment opportunities.

Would you hire an openly LGBT person on your staff?

Yes

Please discuss your views on amending the law to include such protections on real or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

I believe these protections should be enacted for employment, housing, and public accommodations. These laws should be amended on a federal level so that the LGBT community across America can be ensured an equal level of protection. This form of equality should be guaranteed at the federal level and not up to individual states.

I oppose “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and any other federal policy that allows discrimination. I would co-sponsor bills that would target removing discrimination in our federal laws.

I favor offering domestic partnership benefits to federal employees and I believe that the tax code should be amended to give the same tax-exempt status to domestic partners as we currently have for heterosexual couples. In addition, the Family and Medical Act should be expanded to allow leave to care for domestic partners, same-sex married partners, grandparents, siblings and adult children.

Yes, I would support government regulations that would stop this discrimination.

I will support any efforts in Congress as well as any local efforts to address this problem. How to address this problem on a federal level is difficult, but it remains a concern based on discrimination. I would be open to hearing some solutions proposed by the LGBT community.

Do you support domestic partner benefits for government and governmental agency employees?

Yes

Discuss your thoughts on marriage equality for same-sex couples; while the position you seek may not directly affect this issue, it is important for us to understand your perspective.

I strongly support civil unions that give same-sex couples all the rights and benefits that heterosexual couples are granted. I would ardently oppose a constitutional amendment to ban civil marriage for same sex couples proposed by President Bush.

Over the past decade, government money has been used to promote “abstinence-only-until-marriage” programs in schools. Even though same-sex couples still cannot legally marry in Pennsylvania, to qualify for government support, schools must teach that any sexual relationships outside of marriage are “likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects." Do you support or oppose abstinence-only-until-marriage curricula?

Oppose

Discuss your thoughts on government's role in shaping school curricula for sex education, including comprehensive education that advocates for safe sex and the use of condoms and birth control.

As a former public school teacher, I believe that curriculum is best designed at the local level so it can address individual and possibly unique needs and priorities of a school. Sex education in schools should be comprehensive and discuss all forms of birth control and not solely abstinence. Studies show that abstinence only programs have negative effects in the long run. A curriculum that encompasses all aspects of sex-education that teaches our youth to make informed decisions would be wise.

Do you have any thoughts on the formation of gay-straight student alliances within the public school systems?

If students are willing to form a gay-straight alliance as an extra-curricular activity, they should be allowed to do so. This would create greater awareness and subsequently decrease discrimination.

Typically, in most schools there is a “no tolerance” policy for bullying. There is room for great progress when it comes to enforcing those policies, however. Again awareness programs and disciplinary action is needed to curb discrimination and hate crimes.

Do you support needle exchange as a way of reducing new HIV infections in IV drug users?

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

I would support prevention programs for HIV and will support funding for research, prevention, and treatment programs within the Department of Health and Human Services, including the National Institute of Health and the Center for Disease Control. I will support legislation that would fund international programs aimed at reducing the infection rate and helping to eliminate the AIDS epidemic in Africa, which has disseminated an entire generation, leaving millions of children as orphans.

Support

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

I would support LGBT people who want to be included in the official Democratic Party structure. The LGBT community plays an important part of strengthening and growing the Democratic Party.

Have you ever supported an openly LGBT person running for public office? Do you believe a person's sexuality or gender identity should stop them from running for public office?

A person’s sexuality or gender identity should NOT stop them from running for public office. I have supported many candidates in general. Barney Frank is a person that I admire. His intelligence and wit has served the Democratic Party well. I would support a LGBT person if I agreed on most of the issues, including party affiliation, and I believed they are the best candidate. A candidate’s sexual orientation is not a factor in my decision making process.

I always respect people of all backgrounds and am against any form of discrimination. I am a businesswoman and I understand the challenges of running a business. I will be happy to discuss this issue with the LGBT community to see how business owners can prosper without facing discrimination. When elected, I will work to help all citizens in this region succeed.

If elected, what outreach would you do to the LGBT business community to encourage their participation in community planning and economic development?

Job creation and economic development are what I want for the region. We can create an entirely new industry by investing in alternative energy. We can create living wage jobs, decelerate global warming, improve national security and achieve energy independence. Southwestern Pennsylvania is uniquely poised to capitalize on this emerging market. LGBT people will be able to take advantage of these business opportunities.

Currently, both locally and statewide, GLBT citizens are underrepresented on Boards and Commissions. Would you advocate on behalf of qualified GLBT citizens who are interested in appointments?

I would advocate on behalf of a qualified GLBT citizen because I believe that the best qualified person should represent on the commission.

Another divisive issue confronting our country is the issue of abortion. Please discuss your position on abortion and any thoughts you have on the current abortion debate.

My position on abortion is that it should be safe, legal, and rare. Safe so that women do not die. Legal so it remains safe. Rare so that abortion rates decrease. If family planning, including emergency contraception, is widely accessible and affordable this occurs. I would support increases in funding for family planning both internationally and domestically. I support stem cell research, which as a side note would have economic impact on this region as well. I would oppose efforts to weaken or overturn Row v. Wade.

What other endorsements have you received? Are you supported by any unions?

I have received an endorsement from the Communication Workers Union, NOW, Women’s Political Caucus, Women Under 40 and Women’s Campaign Fund. In addition, I have received endorsements from many elected officials and leaders like Rep. Lisa Bennington, City Council President Doug Shields, City Councilman Bill Peduto and City Councilman Patrick Dowd. For a complete list, please visit my web site at www.HaferforCongress.com

If you are endorsed by Steel City Stonewall Democrats, will you display it on your campaign literature, when possible and appropriate?

Yes

Are there particular areas of concern that you have that we have not addressed?

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Signature of candidate and date signed

Beth Hafer
Candidate for U.S. Congress (PA-18)
February 17, 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Candidate: Steve O'Donnell
Office Sought: U.S. House of Representatives, 18th District
Email address: friends@electodonnell.com

Please list any receptions, events, parades or other functions that you have attended that were sponsored by an LGBT group or organization:

I really haven't to my knowlege attended an event sponsored by a LGBT group or oranization.

Describe your familiarity with Greater Pittsburgh's LGBT Community.

It is limited at this time.

What is your position on hiring LGBT people? Should LGBT people be hired in the public sector?

I would have no problem hiring someone from the LGBT community and I do think LGBT people should be hired in the public sector. Further I see the descrimination against hiring LGBT people as a violation of civil liberties.

Would you hire an openly LGBT person on your staff?

Yes

Please discuss your views on amending the law to include such protections on real or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

The passage of laws at the federal level should derive at a minimum from the constitutional right of equal protection underthe laws. Additionally, the Declaration of Independence which must be read in conjunction with the consitution makes clear that values of this country (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) must necessarily be opperationalized with in the body of the constitution.

Yes

I would support programs that are designed to reach out and educate people regarding this issue and others that affect people in the LGBT community

Do you support domestic partner benefits for government and governmental agency employees?

Yes

Discuss your thoughts on marriage equality for same-sex couples; while the position you seek may not directly affect this issue, it is important for us to understand your perspective.

I would refer the reader to my position relative to equal protection under the laws

Over the past decade, government money has been used to promote “abstinence-only-until-marriage” programs in schools. Even though same-sex couples still cannot legally marry in Pennsylvania, to qualify for government support, schools must teach that any sexual relationships outside of marriage are “likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects." Do you support or oppose abstinence-only-until-marriage curricula?

I believe tht states have the right to set their own standards with respect to the education of their children as long as such standards do not violate the constitution or federal statues.

Discuss your thoughts on government's role in shaping school curricula for sex education, including comprehensive education that advocates for safe sex and the use of condoms and birth control.

Please look to my answer of the previous question

Do you have any thoughts on the formation of gay-straight student alliances within the public school systems?

Again, my position with respect to this matter turns on my belief that states and local communities must set such standards or policies. Again, my only proviso in this regard is that such plicies or pratices can not violate constitution rights or federal legislative guarantees.

Protecting children from bullying must be on of our highest priorties regardless of why a the child is being targeted. Schools must be places seen by all children as sanctuaries where difference is embraced and where learning is job one.

Do you support needle exchange as a way of reducing new HIV infections in IV drug users?

Yes

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

I don't know what I would do. I would have to study the issue and determine what role if any the federal government would take regarding this matter

Yes

If elected, what would you do about this issue?

Promote the inclusion of LGBT groups within the Democratic Party

Have you ever supported an openly LGBT person running for public office? Do you believe a person's sexuality or gender identity should stop them from running for public office?

I never pay attention to a persons sexual orientation therefore I cannot recall if I have supported a LGBT person running for public office. I do not believe that a pesons sexuality or gender identity should preclude them from running for office.

If the positions that I have laid out above are adopted, followed, or adhered to then our country would be more welcoming to LGBT citizens

If elected, what outreach would you do to the LGBT business community to encourage their participation in community planning and economic development?

In general, actively participating in outreach programs of this sort would not be seen by me as a responsibility of United States Congressman.

Currently, both locally and statewide, GLBT citizens are underrepresented on Boards and Commissions. Would you advocate on behalf of qualified GLBT citizens who are interested in appointments?

I would advocate for the inclusion of qualified individuals regardless of their gender or sexual orientation or for that matter their race, color, creed, or the existence of a disability

Another divisive issue confronting our country is the issue of abortion. Please discuss your position on abortion and any thoughts you have on the current abortion debate.

The decision in Roe v. Wade derives in part from the constitutional prohibition against depriving any person of their life, liberty, or property without the due process of the law. Implicit with persons right to liberty is a persons right to privacy. The courts concluded that individuals have a constitutional right to privacy and therfore under certain limiting conditions had a right to make such choices without goverment interference. I believe that there exists a constitutional right to privacy and therefore I believe a person has the right to choose their course of action in this regard subject to certain restrictions.

What other endorsements have you received? Are you supported by any unions?

I have received the Allegheny County Democratic Endorsement and the endorsements of six state house representatives in the 18th Congressional district.

If you are endorsed by Steel City Stonewall Democrats, will you display it on your campaign literature, when possible and appropriate?

Yes

Are there particular areas of concern that you have that we have not addressed?

I noted that the questionnaire did not raise the issue of adoptions by gay or lesbian individuals.

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Signature of candidate and date signed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click The Link Below For Questionnaires For Candidates For the Pennsylvania Legislature

Wine Tasting at THERE BAR

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:40:59 -0500

Thanks to "THERE BAR" manager: Corey, bar owner: Scott Noxon (both pictured below), & all the rest of the people who came to the events at THERE BAR, Pegasus, & The Eagle. We raised $288.00 for Steel-City Stonewall Democrats & $188.00 for the Pennsylvania Democratic Party.

Website and new report unearth surprising responses on hot-button HIV/AIDS issues

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:06:13 -0500

Make sure to check out the link to the "quick chart" that compares ALL of the Democratic and Republican Presidential candidates.

New York City, Nov. 28, 2007 — Housing Works, Gay Men's Health Crisis (GMHC), and the AIDS Foundation of Chicago—three of the nation's leading AIDS organizations—polled 16 presidential hopefuls on pressing AIDS-related issues as part of an ongoing HIV/AIDS candidate and voter education campaign. Now the results are available on AIDSVote.org.

"World AIDS Day is this Saturday, but you could also say that World AIDS Day is Election Day 2008. That's because our next President will have the opportunity and the responsibility to end AIDS," said Charles King, President and CEO of Housing Works. "She or he will have the tools to treat 33 million people living with HIV—including over a million Americans—around the planet, as well as the tools to stop the spread of the virus. We're here to build the political will to make that happen."

"More than ever, the American public is calling for meaningful health care reform which includes bold leadership in the area of AIDS," said GMHC Chief Operating Officer Robert Bank. "Voters need to know what the candidates will do to fight AIDS when determining their readiness to be President."

The launch of AIDSVote.org, timed to coincide with World AIDS Day on December 1, features the results of the AIDSVote.org candidate questionnaire and Where Do They Stand? The Gay Men's Health Crisis Report on the 2008 Presidential Candidates and HIV/AIDS Issues, a detailed portrait of every candidate's history in public life on HIV/AIDS issues.

The AIDSVote.org website answers questions like "where does Rudy Giuliani stand on needle exchange funding?"; "will Sen. Barack Obama end federal support for ineffective and harmful abstinence-only education?"; and "will Sen. Hillary Clinton redouble efforts against global HIV/AIDS?". Voting records and public comments provide the basis for GMHC's comprehensive report and a useful "quick chart" comparing the candidates' AIDS-related public record and positions.

Some of the notable information available on AIDSVote.org and on GMHC.org:

The GMHC report documents, for the first time in one place, the stark differences between Democratic and Republican presidential candidates on nearly every AIDS issue. For example, seven Democrats have committed to investing $50 billion to fight HIV/AIDS globally over the next five years. No Republican candidate has made a similar commitment. All eight Democratic candidates support comprehensive sex education, whereas seven of eight Republicans have opposed it. Most of the Democrats support lifting the ban against HIV-positive foreign nationals visiting and/or immigrating to the U.S.; most Republican candidates either support the existing ban or have not come out against it.

The three leading Democratic candidates—Sen. Barack Obama, former Sen. John Edwards, and Sen. Hillary Clinton—have all publicly supported ending the ban on federal funding for needle exchange, a scientifically proven intervention to reduce the spread of HIV without increasing drug use. President George W. Bush and former President Bill Clinton faced stiff criticism by public health experts for failing to lift the ban during their terms in office.

For the first time, five presidential candidates—Clinton, Edwards, Obama, Rep. Dennis Kucinich, and Gov. Bill Richardson—have committed to crafting a national AIDS strategy early in their first term if elected. The creation of a comprehensive outcomes-based national AIDS strategy with explicit benchmarks and accountability mechanisms is a key plank in the AIDSVote.org platform. The U.S. requires nations applying for billions of dollars in federal funding under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to develop such plans—but the U.S. has yet to develop its own national strategy to combat the domestic HIV/AIDS crisis.

AIDSVote.org is a nonpartisan voter and candidate education campaign endorsed by dozens of leading AIDS organizations including the Campaign to End AIDS, AIDS Action Council, the National Association of People with AIDS, the Global AIDS Alliance, and HealthGAP.

While not endorsing candidates for public office, AIDSVote.org is dedicated to ensuring that presidential candidates know about the best possible strategies to make progress against HIV/AIDS in the U.S. and abroad. The website includes domestic and global AIDS platforms, which detail how the next president of the U.S. can end AIDS in places as remote as South Africa and as close as South Carolina.

"We not only hope to better inform voters about how important HIV/AIDS policy issues and the need for a national AIDS strategy are in the election but also hope to better inform the candidates themselves," said Rebecca Haag, AIDS Action Council executive director.

"AIDSVote.org wants to make sure that whoever moves into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in January 2009 will make ending the AIDS epidemic a top priority," said David Ernesto Munar, vice president at the AIDS Foundation of Chicago. "It's a matter of life and death."

The answers to the candidate questionnaire and GMHC's candidate report are only the first installments that will be available on AIDSVote.org, which will track the presidential candidates' positions on HIV/AIDS up until the November 2008 election.

# # #

By Daryl J. Cochrane, MPA and Kristin D. Goodwin, MSW
Download the report at www.gmhc.org

Also, you can check out the Democratic Presidential Candidates responses to HRC's questionnaire by following this link

THANKS TO EVERYONE who helped fight for progressive change in last years May 15th Primary as well as the recent November 6th 2007 PA Judicial, County, & Municipal Elections.

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:09:10 -0500

Tuesday, November 6th, 2007 was a historic day for Pennsylvania. Bruce Kraus became the first openly gay person ever elected to public office in Western Pennsylvania. Born and raised in Pittsburgh's South Side, he is endowed with extensive experience and knowledge about the issues that face the city. His leadership and community ties will be a great asset in making Pittsburgh a better place for everyone in the metropolitan area. Bruce will be joined by two other exciting new comers to the City Council. Ricky Burgess, a prominent Reverend and former Board Member of the Pittsburgh AIDS Task Force and Patrick Dowd, a former member of the Pittsburgh School Board.

In judicial races, Debra Todd's victorious campaign for Pennsylvania Supreme Court shows that a judge can rule in favor of GLBT equality and go on to win election to the highest Court in the Commonwealth. Seamus McCaffery will also be a great addition to the Supreme Court. In addition, to his SCSD endorsement, McCaffery was also endorsed by our counterpart Philadelphia chapter, & the Philly Gay News.

Unfortunately, control of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will still be up in the air because by the time McCaffery and Todd ascend to the high court in January, Chief Justice Ralph J. Cappy will have stepped down, leaving the court evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. Governor Ed Rendell will have to battle hard with the Republican controlled State Senate to get them to confirm a progressive Democrat to replace Cappy.

We would also like to congratulate Christine Donohue who hosted our Barney Frank Meet & Greet in her historic landmark home. Christine did not just win one of the 3 vacant seats on the PA Superior Court, she also finished the race with more votes than any other Candidate for Superior Court.

Finally, we would like to congratulate all of the other great candidates who won.

Text of Bruce Kraus' Address From His Swearing In Speech on January 7, 2008.

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:27:21 -0500

All of us might wish at times that we lived in a more tranquil world, but we don’t. And if our times are difficult and perplexing, so are they challenging and filled with opportunity.”
Robert Kennedy

These words, spoken by Robert Kennedy some 40 years ago, are still significant today, in what they can teach us. We are not the first to have lived through turbulent times.

The recorded journals, safely housed within our City Clerks’ office, are filled with the transcripts of thousands of past Council sessions, and tell the story of the challenges and opportunities we have faced in our 250 year history.

But, through these difficult times, and because of the strength and character of the people of this great City, our resiliency in the face of adversity, and by the grace of God, we are here, today, to begin recording the journal of this new Council. One which will tell our story of the challenges we will face, the opportunities we will seize and the celebrations of our strengths and accomplishments, as we set Pittsburgh on the path to another 250 years filled with promise.

The stories we tell speak of the journeys we take. And as it is with many of life’s journeys, ours was one shared by friends and loved ones alike, too numerous to mention by name, and yet in your hearts, you know who you are. Your love, unwavering support and unshakable belief in me, now brings us to this final step of our first journey together, and onward to the first step of a new and exciting adventure, full of the hope and promise of everything that can be. Without you, I would not be standing here today, and so from the deepest parts of my heart, I say “Thank You.” You have entrusted me to be your voice and to carry your cause. For that, I am genuinely humbled. I pledge to use this confidence you have placed in me, to help lead this great city of ours into the future, with integrity, grace and compassion.

Once in a lifetime, a great leader comes along, whose courage and moral compass will not allow them to stand idly by, while fear and prejudice remove thousands of American citizens from having a voice, in our democratic process. Such a man was, City of San Francisco Board Supervisor, Harvey Milk, who on November 27, 1978, paid the price with his life, so that one day, some 30 years later, ones orientation would no longer be a factor in determining their ability to serve as an elected official. And so today, I honor his memory and I thank him for his courageous and selfless sacrifice that cleared the way for so many of us.

Pittsburgh’s history is filled with leaders who faced daunting tasks, and yet found the courage to answer their “call to action”. David Lawrence led a coalition of government and business leaders to build the Golden Triangle and, in the process, forever transformed Pittsburgh’s “smoky city image.” Richard Caliguiri provided the stable and effective stewardship that laid the groundwork for Pittsburgh’s renaissance, into one of our nation’s most livable cities. Sophie Masloff and Tom Murphy had the vision and foresight to see the value in the revitalization of our North Shore and our riverfront properties. And, after the much too early passing of “everybody’s mayor”, Bob O’Connor, Luke Raverstahl accepted the challenge to lead us into a new renaissance, as Pittsburgh is, once again, named as our nation’s most livable city.

And now, how will we, this new council, answer our call to action?

It is my belief, that our greatest strength and most valuable resource is our diversity. Pittsburgh is this wonderful hodgepodge of humanity. We come from every segment of society and culture, and yet share in one great commonality; our deep love for, and desire to safeguard and nurture, the neighborhoods in which we live. Our ethnic heritages, deep spiritual traditions and unmatched work ethic are an immeasurable wealth of riches. Our varied neighborhoods, world-class cultural venues, winning sports teams, lush parks and internationally acclaimed universities and hospitals, are all assets that are the envy of many metropolitan areas, and provide us with the tools to continue Pittsburgh’s transformation, into one of America’s truly great urban centers.

So with all of these resources at hand, what will we choose to make the signature achievements of this new council, now so full of promise and endless possibility? What will history record about the time we will serve the people of this great city?

My hope is that we would work to provide an open, transparent and public process that reestablishes trust and confidence in government. That we could envision for our future, a city where even the most vulnerable among us are safe and well provided for. A city that sets the standard, for what a clean city can be. One where parks and recreation facilities flourish, and our commitment, to leading the nation in Green building, and responsible management of our natural resources, is stronger than ever. Where our children attend first-rate schools and have every opportunity for the very best education possible; whose futures are financially secure, because we have been responsible stewards of the people’s money.

I see a city where every neighborhood will see the fruits of real economic development, and with it, have access to living wage jobs that will sustain home ownership and provide for young families.

But mostly, my hope is for a city, where all people are invited to our great common table, to share in an equal voice and have every opportunity to participate in, the stewardship of their futures, and have access to every resource that will lift them and their loved ones up, to their very highest quality of life.

And so, once again, I will find my voice within words, so eloquently spoken, by Robert Kennedy and put forward this challenge to us, this new council of the City of Pittsburgh for the year 2008, by saying:

“Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say, why not.”

City may limit campaign donations

Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:50:54 -0500

State Supreme Court ruling clears the way

Monday, January 07, 2008
By Rich Lord, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

One-quarter of Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's campaign money came in checks of $10,000 or more.

His sometime rival, Councilman William Peduto, got a campaign check for $50,000.

Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato faced little opposition for re-election, and built a $1.9 million war chest that could be ammo in a run for governor.

Some say those are signs of a campaign finance system run amok.

Reformers recently learned that they might be able to do something about it. The state Supreme Court on Dec. 28 ruled that a Philadelphia campaign finance ordinance that limits contributions doesn't violate state law, in effect allowing other municipalities to do the same.

Now Mr. Peduto has drafted legislation like Philadelphia's, putting a cap on contributions, as he tried to do in 2004. Mr. Ravenstahl said he's also looking at other reforms, like posting contribution information online.

The Supreme Court's 4-2 decision paves the way for city and county campaign cash limits, said Barry Kauffman, executive director of Common Cause/Pennsylvania. He thinks contribution limits are essential "to eliminate, or at least reduce, the possibility of corrupt relationships between donors and public officials."

Pennsylvania is one of just 12 states that put no limits on campaign contributions by individuals, partnerships and political action committees. Corporations and unions can't contribute directly, but can set up PACs to do so.

Philadelphia is both a city and a county. In late 2006, its council passed and its mayor signed an ordinance limiting contributions to candidates for mayor, council and six row offices to $2,500 by individuals and $10,000 for business partnerships or PACs.

Just-elected Mayor Michael Nutter sought to have the limits enforced during his race last year. Rival candidates sued, claiming state law preempts municipalities from governing elections. The court disagreed.

Mr. Peduto said he had been waiting for the court to rule before revisiting the issue, and will propose legislation this month. His draft ordinance would limit individual contributions in city races to $2,500, and donations from PACs to $5,000.

Anyone who contributed the maximum would be barred from receiving no-bid contracts from the city.

"It would eliminate the pay-to-play system," he said.

Mr. Kauffman said the numbers proposed by Mr. Peduto seem a bit high.

"Once you start getting over $1,000, we're beginning to have doubts" about whether a contribution could influence policy, he said.

The proposed limits would have modest effect on council races, where most candidates get just one or two five-figure contributions from family or friends.

Mr. Ravenstahl worried that caps on contributions would make it harder to raise money, potentially allowing someone with personal wealth to swoop in and buy an office.

Limits could allow "an elite person, a wealthy person, the opportunity to spend countless dollars," because court decisions have said that government can't cap the use of a candidate's personal funds. Limits "would therefore put somebody that's not as wealthy, like myself or the other council members, at a disadvantage."

The Philadelphia ordinance deals with that. If any candidate pours $250,000 or more of personal wealth into a race, the other candidates can then collect contributions of double the normal limits. Mr. Peduto's legislation mirrors that, though he noted he's open to amendments.

Mr. Ravenstahl said his administration is "looking at a variety of different options ... A lot of it boils down, as far as I'm concerned, to transparency, and people just having the ability to know who's giving to whom. So we're looking at posting that information on a Web site.

"I'm not taking anything off the table," he added, including contribution limits.

Mr. Ravenstahl raised $1.15 million in 2006 and 2007. At least $299,000 of that came from 25 supporters -- including individuals and labor union PACs -- that wrote checks of $10,000 or more.

They include William Kratsa Jr., whose family firm was recently picked to build a hotel on a city-controlled South Oakland site; Jack Piatt, whose Millcraft Industries is the central player in city-backed Downtown development; and Merrill Stabile, whose Alco Parking manages some city garages and benefits from parking tax cuts.

In other cases, multiple executives from development firms with matters before the city teamed up to donate significant amounts. Owners of Walnut Capital, for instance, gave $16,000 in multiple checks while getting city help for their Bakery Square project. Executives from Boston-based Beacon/Corcoran Jennison gave $23,000 months after the mayor brokered a deal allowing expansion of its Oak Hill development in the Hill District.

"Once you get to that range of contribution, you're getting into relationships which can be tainted," said Mr. Kauffman. "That could get [donors] at least immediate access, and perhaps even preferred consideration for contracts and permits."

Mr. Peduto got the year's biggest contribution to the mayor's race -- $50,000 from William Benter, owner of Acusis Medical Transcription. After he dropped his bid, he gave $8,000 back as part of a partial refund to his big donors.

He said he didn't feel bad about taking that check.

"The person that I took the contribution from, and the businesses he owns, have no, zero, involvement with city government," Mr. Peduto said.

He also got a $10,000 contribution from Sara West, an apartment developer who has opposed some new city landlord regulations. He gave her back $1,600.

Mark DeSantis raised $430,000 in a failed Republican bid to topple Mr. Ravenstahl. Though he benefited from eight checks for $10,000, he said lower contribution limits would help challengers.

"Vendors, potential vendors, people doing business with government can give $20,000, $30,000, or even $50,000," said Mr. DeSantis, adding that the money typically goes to incumbents. "You have to put some kind of ceiling on the individual amounts. The feds did that years ago."

Federal law allows individuals to give candidates for president, the Senate and the House no more than $2,300, and PACs can donate $5,000.

Forty-five states have passed laws that, on average, limit individual contributions to gubernatorial candidates to $3,500 and to legislators at $1,500, according to the National Conference of State Legislators.

"Between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh having campaign finance reform as an agenda item, we may finally be able to get Pennsylvania to realize that we're [nearly] the only state without contribution limits, meaning the pay-to-play system is alive and well," said Mr. Peduto.

Mr. Onorato, through a spokesman, said he believes campaign finance should be regulated at the state, not county, level.

Several veteran County Council members, who considered campaign check limits a few years ago, agreed with Mr. Onorato. They worried that contribution limits would keep county officials from raising money that they could later use in races against state officials who face no limits.

"Let's say Onorato as county executive is running for governor against [state Auditor General] Jack Wagner in the [Democratic] primary," said Republican county Councilman Vince Gastgeb. "Why does Jack get to raise as much as he wants while Dan is limited? ... Reform's good. The struggle we had was the uniformity issue."

County Council President Rich Fitzgerald, a Democrat, agreed, adding that he'd ultimately like to see public financing of campaigns to eliminate the fund-raising game entirely.

Portland, Ore., Albuquerque, N.M., and New York City have instituted public financing of campaigns, said Deborah Goldberg, Democracy Program director at the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law.

Five-figure donations to local campaigns "can't be good for the political process," she said. "It can't be good for accountability to the people. As honest as our representatives usually are, they can't help but worry about what's going to happen to the sources of the money they need for elections if they don't keep in mind the interests of the donors."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Correction/Clarification: (Published Jan. 8, 2008) Twelve states, including Pennsylvania, put no limits on campaign contributions by individuals, partnerships and political action committees, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The number of such states was wrong in this story as originally published Jan. 7, 2007.
Rich Lord can be reached at rlord@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1542.
First published on January 7, 2008 at 12:00 am

3 new council members sworn in; Shields remains president

Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:26:52 -0500

Monday, January 07, 2008

By Rich Lord, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pittsburgh City Council swore in three new members today, and all sounded notes of change in speeches before a packed Council Chamber.

If the first day is any indication, the turnover of one-third of the body could mark a shift in tone after years during which most council members were concerned less with social change than with the day-to-day provision of services in their districts.

Council also reelected Doug Shields to its presidency.

The Rev. Ricky Burgess, 50, of North Point Breeze, who replaces Twanda Carlisle, called for a focus on "social justice" to reverse what he characterized as "serious challenges" for many residents.

"Our steel mills are gone and our economy is declining," he said. "Our population is dwindling and our residents are becoming older. Our neighborhoods remain economically and socially homogenous, and our city's poor remain trapped in a cycle of inter-generational poverty."

The remedy: "Equity, in every contract proposed, and in every development planned. Equity, in every public dollar allocated and in every public policy recommended."

Bruce Kraus, 53, of the South Side Flats, replaces Jeff Koch.

Mr. Kraus, who is openly gay, cited gay rights icon Harvey Milk, a San Francisco politician who was assassinated in 1978 "so that one day, some 30 years later, one's orientation would no longer be a factor in determining their ability to serve as an elected official."

He called for "a city where all people are invited to our great common table, to share in an equal voice and have every opportunity to participate in the stewardship of their futures, and have access to every resource that will lift them and their loved-ones up [to] the very highest quality of life."

Patrick Dowd, 39, of Highland Park, replaces Len Bodack.

Mr. Dowd called for "ending the old politics of personality" so council can help "craft a new vision for Pittsburgh." He said he decorated his new office with "some smelly shoes" that he wore every day while knocking on hundreds of doors during the campaign. "They will stand in my office for the next four years, and they will remind me ... of the importance of communication and connection" with the people who elected him.

Mr. Shields and Darlene Harris and also were sworn in to new four-year terms.

Council voted 8-0 to keep its presidency in the hands of Mr. Shields, who gained that post after Mayor Luke Ravenstahl ascended to the mayor's office upon the Sept. 1, 2006, death of Mayor Bob O'Connor.

Mr. Shields' re-election came after weeks of jockeying and a weekend flurry of negotiations, according to council insiders. Councilman Jim Motznik had been viewed as another top contender, and most of the other members were floated as possible compromise candidates as the nine-member body hashed out its internal differences.

Mr. Motznik nominated Mr. Shields to the post, and there were no other candidates. Councilwoman Tonya Payne was not present for the vote. Mr. Shields named William Peduto chairman of the key Finance Committee.

Mr. Shields' tenure as president has been marked by occasional conflict with Mr. Ravenstahl and with state-appointed fiscal overseers, and by his authorship of contentious legislation on the handling of domestic violence accusations against city police.

"We shall form consensus," he urged today. "We shall work together. We shall heal political wounds."

Mr. Ravenstahl urged council to "continue what I would argue is a tremendous amount of momentum" in the city. Sworn in to his old council seat four years ago, he jokingly told the new members "it's downhill from here."

The swearing-in ceremony began with a parade of youth, starting with the presentation of colors by the Oliver High School Junior Army ROTC Bear Battalion. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Dowd's children Mackenzie, Will and Quinn; Mr. Burgess's daughter Candace; and Mr. Kraus' niece Kaleigh. A trio of voices from Pittsburgh CAPA High School sang the national anthem.

References to the late Council President Eugene "Jeep" DePasquale, who died Wednesday, started with the photo of his swearing in that sat on the council clerk's table, and continued into Roman Catholic Bishop David A. Zubik's invocation. He called for a moment of silence in the late councilman's honor before asking council to "help create a human society built on love and peace."

The ceremony marked cameo returns to city government for Common Pleas Judge Tom Flaherty, previously the city controller, who swore in Ms. Harris, and for District Judge Eugene Ricciardi, a former council president, who swore in Mr. Kraus.

First published on January 7, 2008 at 11:06 am

City council taking on a new look and attitude

Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:03:14 -0500

Analysis

Tuesday, January 08, 2008
By Rich Lord, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Running the city of Pittsburgh just got trickier.

Last year, Mayor Luke Ravenstahl could pretty much count on getting a council majority to support his agenda, and faced a lame-duck acting controller at audit time. That changed yesterday with the swearing-in of three rookie council members and new Controller Michael Lamb, and an 8-0 vote that kept the irrepressible Doug Shields as council president.

Sometime mayoral rival Councilman William Peduto will chair committee meetings and budget hearings as the finance chair, and ambitious newcomer Patrick Dowd will head a special committee on crafting a council agenda.

Agendas, in fact, abounded -- a change of tone in a city hall that has been dominated for years by fiscal troubles and nuts-and-bolts pragmatism.

"There's nothing we can't achieve," said Mr. Shields. "We stand by ready to help shape this agenda, along with the mayor, to serve the public."

Mr. Ravenstahl urged council members to "continue what I would argue is a tremendous amount of momentum." Council members said they want to work with him, but showed no signs of being pushovers.

Joining council are Mr. Dowd, 39, of Highland Park; the Rev. Ricky Burgess, 50, of North Point Breeze; and Bruce Kraus, 53, of the South Side Flats.

Their first vote was for the body's president, and the always-contentious contest came down to a week of heavy politicking, with as many as six members at one time or another considered contenders. One by one, the newcomers drifted into Mr. Shields' camp, making him a lock to retain the post he's held since Mr. Ravenstahl ascended to the mayor's office after the Sept. 1, 2006, death of Mayor Bob O'Connor.

"Let's be honest, it was probably a long shot for me to become the council president," said Councilman Jim Motznik, a contender for the post and mayoral ally. "The majority of council members thought that Mr. Shields was doing a good job."

"There was a recognition in the body that they wanted to maintain a certain independence, that they wanted to maintain a healthy check-and-balance system," said Mr. Shields.

Mr. Dowd's aye was crucial, and he afterwards termed it "a very difficult vote, to be honest. I really want to try to end the politics of personality and was hoping we could find a way to do that with Councilman Shields. I still think we're not out of the woods on that."

Councilwoman Tonya Payne, another mayoral ally, left the chamber shortly before the vote, and missed it. An aide said she had to attend another meeting, and she couldn't be reached for comment.

Mr. Shields has tussled with the administration on animal control, handling of police domestic violence incidents and the Pittsburgh Promise of college tuition grants. Mr. Ravenstahl had proposed that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, chief funding source for the tuition aid promise, get credit for its contributions against any potential new taxes or fees, and Mr. Shields was a chief critic. UPMC later said it didn't need credits.

"I don't see any need for a schism between the Mayor's office and council," Mr. Shields said. "If the mayor should fail, we all fail, and we will not tolerate that."

The three newcomers got an unusual share of council's power.

Mr. Dowd said his new special committee will try to build consensus on council and with the mayor's office on an agenda for this year.

Mr. Burgess will be president pro tem, running some meetings when the president is absent. Mr. Kraus is council's public safety chair, shepherding bills related to police, fire, emergency medicine and building inspection.

They bring an emphasis on diversity and fairness.

Mr. Burgess, who is black, called for "equity, in every contract proposed, and in every development planned. Equity, in every public dollar allocated and in every public policy recommended."

Mr. Kraus, who is gay, cited assassinated San Francisco Board Supervisor Harvey Milk as a role model, and called for "a city where all people are invited to our great common table, to share in an equal voice and have every opportunity to participate in the stewardship of their futures."

Member Darlene Harris and Mr. Shields also were sworn in to new four-year terms.

Mr. Lamb, 45, of Mount Washington, becomes the first newly elected controller since 1984. He was previously the Allegheny County Prothonotary, and has advocated changes like county home rule and elimination of row offices. He ran for mayor in 2005, arguing for more cooperation between the city and county.

Mr. Lamb said he and the mayor aren't "particularly close, but we get along really well ... I've talked to him about what I see as my responsibility, and my responsibility is not really to the mayor and not to council, but to the people of Pittsburgh. So we're going to do the job of going around to these departments, auditing these departments, and we're going to shed light on this government and let people know what's going on in this government, good or bad."

He named Doug Anderson his deputy. That post was long held by Tony Pokora, who served as acting controller for the last two years.

Mr. Pokora, who has sought a job with Mr. Ravenstahl's administration, could not be reached for comment.

Mr. Lamb, who was a council aide 20 years ago, called yesterday "the biggest changeover in council since I began in 1988." Add to that a new controller. "It's a pretty big change in city government, and I'm looking forward to it."

ANALYSIS

Rich Lord can be reached at rlord@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1542.
First published on January 8, 2008 at 12:00 am

The Great Divide

Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:42:40 -0500

editorial from Paul Krugman of the New York Times

Published: December 31, 2007

Yesterday The Times published a highly informative chart laying out the positions of the presidential candidates on major issues. It was, I’d argue, a useful reality check for those who believe that the next president can somehow usher in a new era of bipartisan cooperation.

For what the chart made clear was the extent to which Democrats and Republicans live in separate moral and intellectual universes.

On one side, the Democrats are all promising to get out of Iraq and offering strongly progressive policies on taxes, health care and the environment. That’s understandable: the public hates the war, and public opinion seems to be running in a progressive direction.

What seems harder to understand is what’s happening on the other side — the degree to which almost all the Republicans have chosen to align themselves closely with the unpopular policies of an unpopular president. And I’m not just talking about their continuing enthusiasm for the Iraq war. The G.O.P. candidates are equally supportive of Bush economic policies.

Why would politicians support Bushonomics? After all, the public is very unhappy with the state of the economy, for good reason. The “Bush boom,” such as it was, bypassed most Americans — median family income, adjusted for inflation, has stagnated in the Bush years, and so have the real earnings of the typical worker. Meanwhile, insecurity has increased, with a declining fraction of Americans receiving health insurance from their employers.

And things seem likely to get worse as the election approaches. For a few years, the economy was at least creating jobs at a respectable pace — but as the housing slump and the associated credit crunch accelerate and spill over to the rest of the economy, most analysts expect employment to weaken, too.

All in all, it’s an economic and political environment in which you’d expect Republican politicians, as a sheer matter of calculation, to look for ways to distance themselves from the current administration’s economic policies and record — say, by expressing some concern about rising income gaps and the fraying social safety net.

In fact, however, except for Mike Huckabee — a peculiar case who’ll deserve more discussion if he stays in contention — the leading Republican contenders have gone out of their way to assure voters that they will not deviate an inch from the Bush path. Why? Because the G.O.P. is still controlled by a conservative movement that does not tolerate deviations from tax-cutting, free-market, greed-is-good orthodoxy.

To see the extent to which Republican politicians still cower before the power of movement conservatism, consider the sad case of John McCain.

Mr. McCain’s lingering reputation as a maverick straight talker comes largely from his opposition to the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003, which he said at the time were too big and too skewed to the rich. Those objections would seem to have even more force now, with America facing the costs of an expensive war — which Mr. McCain fervently supports — and with income inequality reaching new heights.

But Mr. McCain now says that he supports making the Bush tax cuts permanent. Not only that: he’s become a convert to crude supply-side economics, claiming that cutting taxes actually increases revenues. That’s an assertion even Bush administration officials concede is false.

Oh, and what about his earlier opposition to tax cuts? Mr. McCain now says he opposed the Bush tax cuts only because they weren’t offset by spending cuts.

Aside from the logical problem here — if tax cuts increase revenue, why do they need to be offset? — even a cursory look at what Mr. McCain said at the time shows that he’s trying to rewrite history: he actually attacked the Bush tax cuts from the left, not the right. But he has clearly decided that it’s better to fib about his record than admit that he wasn’t always a rock-solid economic conservative.

So what does the conversion of Mr. McCain into an avowed believer in voodoo economics — and the comparable conversions of Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani — tell us? That bitter partisanship and political polarization aren’t going away anytime soon.

There’s a fantasy, widely held inside the Beltway, that men and women of good will from both parties can be brought together to hammer out bipartisan solutions to the nation’s problems.

If such a thing were possible, Mr. McCain, Mr. Romney and Mr. Giuliani — a self-proclaimed maverick, the former governor of a liberal state and the former mayor of an equally liberal city — would seem like the kind of men Democrats could deal with. (O.K., maybe not Mr. Giuliani.) In fact, however, it’s not possible, not given the nature of today’s Republican Party, which has turned men like Mr. McCain and Mr. Romney into hard-line ideologues. On economics, and on much else, there is no common ground between the parties.